She and I were talking about names and meaning and family and history. And I thought I was interesting, even if I was in the minority. So maybe you will too.
I don’t give a fuck about family names. To start with, there’s important family and there’s family that I don’t care about one whit. The former is made up of the people I’ve known – parents, siblings, aunts, uncles, cousins, grandparents I know, and the three greatgrandparents I’ve known (I do stretch a bit to include the Alzheimer’s-riddled man I only remember seeing once). The latter is everyone else who came before. I have no obligation to them, no responsibility to carry on the family line or some other nice thing like that. If I marry, I’m doing it for myself. Not because I have a duty as the eldest grandchild to make sure the family name survives. the family name means nothing more than the family it stands for. Some good, some bad, most ultimately unimportant – I don’t want my potentialchildren to have any more obligation to my ancestors than I do now. Sure, there are maybe stories I can tell – maternal grandpa twicegreat has a lake and a county in Michigan named for his oldtime surveying. But there’s no need for them to feel some tenuous attachment to a name whose time has passed.
So I think it’d be a good idea if couples started coming up with their own names when they married (or whatever it is they want to do, I suppose). Names have some power in this sense, and here, actually, they have positive power. The name would be something new, just like the bond formed. It could be chosen mutually, representative of what the couple hoped for their union. The name would be a bond in itself. It would have no obligation, no ties except between the two people who shared it.
I ramble like a fucking moron. Sorry.
I don’t give a fuck about family names. To start with, there’s important family and there’s family that I don’t care about one whit. The former is made up of the people I’ve known – parents, siblings, aunts, uncles, cousins, grandparents I know, and the three greatgrandparents I’ve known (I do stretch a bit to include the Alzheimer’s-riddled man I only remember seeing once). The latter is everyone else who came before. I have no obligation to them, no responsibility to carry on the family line or some other nice thing like that. If I marry, I’m doing it for myself. Not because I have a duty as the eldest grandchild to make sure the family name survives. the family name means nothing more than the family it stands for. Some good, some bad, most ultimately unimportant – I don’t want my potentialchildren to have any more obligation to my ancestors than I do now. Sure, there are maybe stories I can tell – maternal grandpa twicegreat has a lake and a county in Michigan named for his oldtime surveying. But there’s no need for them to feel some tenuous attachment to a name whose time has passed.
So I think it’d be a good idea if couples started coming up with their own names when they married (or whatever it is they want to do, I suppose). Names have some power in this sense, and here, actually, they have positive power. The name would be something new, just like the bond formed. It could be chosen mutually, representative of what the couple hoped for their union. The name would be a bond in itself. It would have no obligation, no ties except between the two people who shared it.
I ramble like a fucking moron. Sorry.